Building High-Performance Leadership Teams Training Course

Turn a group of capable senior individuals into a leadership team that trusts each other, argues honestly and decides together.

19 dates in 15 cities · Oct 2026 – Jun 2027

Manama

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

Amsterdam

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Jakarta

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Barcelona

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Paris

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Dubai

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

Amman

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

London

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Kuala Lumpur

Fees: 8900
From:
To:
See all 19 dates & locations
15 cities · filter by city or month

Course overview

Most executive teams are not teams. They are a set of functional heads who meet weekly, report on their own areas, defend their own budgets and leave. Each of them may be excellent. Collectively they produce a series of parallel monologues and a decision that nobody in the room actually owns. The organization below them then receives contradictory signals and, quite reasonably, follows whichever leader is nearest.

This course is about the difference between that group and a real leadership team. It covers the conditions under which senior people will disagree openly, the mechanics of collective decision-making, the alignment work that has to happen before a message leaves the room, and the accountability that a leadership team owes to each other rather than only to the chief executive.

Why leadership teams underperform their members

The failure is structural, not personal. Senior people are rewarded for the performance of their own function, so the incentive to defend it is real. Status is at stake in every disagreement, which makes challenge expensive. And the presence of the chief executive frequently produces the worst outcome of all: an opinion is offered early, everyone reads the room, and the discussion becomes the ratification of a view that nobody has actually tested.

The research on team effectiveness points the other way. Psychological safety, the shared belief that speaking up will not be punished, is the single most consistent predictor of team performance in the literature, and it is hardest to establish precisely where the stakes and the egos are largest.

Course objectives

By the end of the course, participants will be able to:

  • Unite a set of parallel reporting lines into one leadership team.
  • Surface the coalition behavior that decides a meeting in advance.
  • Establish the conditions that make open contradiction safe.
  • Align a senior group on one account of a hard decision.
  • Dissent inside the meeting and commit to the decision made.
  • Confront a peer on the issue without making it personal.
  • Include the member who speaks last before options are judged.
  • Hold a peer to a commitment with no route to the boss.
  • Pledge collective ownership of a change that turns unpopular.
  • Test the team's effectiveness against evidence from below.
  • Speak to a dispersed team without relying on the corridor.
  • Contract the decision rules a senior group will work under.

Course outline

Unit 1: Introduction to high-performance leadership teams

  • The team that is really one leader and six individuals.
  • Enterprise trade-offs no single function can make alone.
  • Size, purpose and agenda discipline in senior groups.
  • Practices that made a documented executive team work.

Unit 2: Team dynamics and collaboration

  • Status, coalition behavior and who sits beside whom.
  • Handoffs between senior roles where value is lost.
  • The chief executive effect when the top speaks first.
  • Airtime and the same two voices carrying every meeting.

Unit 3: Trust and psychological safety

  • Assent read from a room in which nobody objects.
  • Challenge to a peer and to the chief executive.
  • A room in which the leader is contradicted and says so.
  • Repairing trust after a peer breaks a commitment.

Unit 4: Communication and executive alignment

  • Disagree and commit, then one voice outside the room.
  • Aligning on the message before anyone briefs a function.
  • The decision unmade in three conversations afterward.
  • Hard conversations between peers with no authority.

Unit 5: Decision-making and problem-solving

  • Naming the decision type before the discussion starts.
  • Consensus, consultation and the call made after input.
  • Agreement in the room and quiet non-compliance after.
  • Making disagreement audible before the decision closes.

Unit 6: Conflict and team resilience

  • Argument about the work versus argument about a person.
  • Intervening before two peers pull the layer below in.
  • Members who neither objected nor complied.
  • Cases where an unresolved conflict cost a strategy.

Unit 7: Innovation and creativity in leadership teams

  • The senior group that produces a third option.
  • Hearing the member who speaks last in every meeting.
  • Protecting an idea long enough for it to be tested.
  • Options on the table before evaluation begins.

Unit 8: Accountability and performance alignment

  • Mutual accountability with no route to the boss.
  • Shared objectives and the incentives that undo them.
  • Tracking commitments that die in the gap after a meeting.
  • Confronting a technically excellent member who costs more.

Unit 9: Leading change through the leadership team

  • The team the organization watches during a change.
  • Visible alignment as the signal read from below.
  • The damage one unaligned leader does in a week.
  • Holding ownership when the change becomes unpopular.

Unit 10: Measuring leadership team performance

  • Decision quality, speed and commitment follow-through.
  • Facilitated review of the team's own meeting records.
  • Linking the team's work to outcomes without overclaiming.
  • A room in which the last review changed something.

Unit 11: Global and cross-cultural leadership teams

  • Leading a dispersed team with no corridor to use.
  • Norms about disagreeing openly with a superior.
  • Headquarters bias and regional leaders who go quiet.
  • Lessons from multinational teams that integrated badly.

Unit 12: Capstone leadership team case study

  • Diagnosing a documented team from its meeting records.
  • Designing the charter, decision rules and discipline.
  • Planning how to introduce it to a group that did not ask.
  • Checking whether the first new decision survived the week.

How the course is delivered

Sessions combine structured explanation with documented case material: executive meeting records, team charters, decision logs and effectiveness reviews that participants read, critique and rebuild in discussion. Worked examples trace a real executive decision from discussion to outcome, including where the commitment broke down. Participants bring their own team dynamics to the room, and time is reserved for them. The course is educational and does not certify participants or assess any individual's leadership performance. Teams that want the broader collaboration foundation often pair this course with Workplace Collaboration and Team Effectiveness.

Who should attend

  • Chief executives and managing directors responsible for the effectiveness of their executive team.
  • Members of an executive committee or senior leadership group.
  • HR and organizational development leaders who facilitate senior team development.
  • Directors preparing to join a leadership team for the first time.

About EuroQuest International Training

EuroQuest International Training was founded in 2015 by a team with more than 25 years of experience in professional development. We run over 1,000 courses and have trained more than 15,000 participants. Our head office is in Bratislava, Slovakia, and we deliver courses through hubs in Dubai, London, Barcelona, Istanbul, Vienna, Paris and Geneva. Courses are built and reviewed by practitioners who have worked in the fields they teach.

Frequently asked questions

Can I attend without my own leadership team?

Yes. Individuals attend regularly and take the diagnosis and the interventions back with them. Where a full team attends together, the discussion naturally turns toward their own dynamics, which is useful but not required.

Does the course include a live lab?

No. There is no live system or technical environment. Participants work from documented team material, meeting records and worked examples analyzed in the room.

What if the problem in my team is the chief executive?

That is a common and legitimate diagnosis, and the course does not avoid it. The units on psychological safety and decision-making deal directly with the leader behavior that suppresses challenge, and with what a member of the team can do about it.

Related courses

Register for this course

Choose a city and date from the schedule above and register online, or contact the EuroQuest team for group bookings and in-house delivery. Our advisers can also arrange in-house delivery for an intact executive team.

All Course Dates & Locations

19 dates · 15 cities · Oct 2026 – Jun 2027

September - 2026
October - 2026
November - 2026
December - 2026
January - 2027
February - 2027
March - 2027
April - 2027
May - 2027
June - 2027
July - 2027
August - 2027
Amman
Amsterdam
Barcelona
Brussels
Budapest
Dubai
Geneva
Istanbul
Jakarta
Kuala Lumpur
London
Madrid
Manama
Paris
Singapore
Showing 19 of 19 dates

Manama

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

Amsterdam

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Jakarta

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Barcelona

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Paris

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Dubai

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

Amman

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

London

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Kuala Lumpur

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

Brussels

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Amman

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

Budapest

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Singapore

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Madrid

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Istanbul

Fees: 8900
From:
To:

Brussels

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Amsterdam

Fees: 9900
From:
To:

Geneva

Fees: 11900
From:
To:

Jakarta

Fees: 9900
From:
To: