Performance Management and Employee Engagement Training Course

Run performance and engagement as one problem, from goal-setting and feedback through recognition, fairness and accountability.

27 dates in 13 cities · Oct 2026 – Jun 2027

Dubai

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Zurich

Fees: 6600
From:
To:

Istanbul

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Amsterdam

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Madrid

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Istanbul

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Dubai

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Jakarta

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Amsterdam

Fees: 5900
From:
To:
See all 27 dates & locations
13 cities · filter by city or month

Course overview

Performance management and engagement are usually run by different people, measured on different cycles, and reported to different executives. That separation is why both underperform. An engagement survey that improves while performance conversations remain avoided has measured comfort. A performance system that drives results while engagement falls has borrowed against next year. The two are the same problem seen from opposite ends: whether people know what good looks like, believe the judgment of it is fair, and have a reason to care.

This course treats them together. It covers the link between performance and engagement, goal-setting and measurement, feedback and coaching, recognition and motivation, and how accountability is sustained once the initial attention fades. The emphasis is on what managers actually do, since the system is only as good as the conversations it produces.

Why most performance systems are disliked

Ask employees what is wrong with performance management and the answers converge: the rating felt predetermined, the feedback arrived once a year and referred to something from March, the goals were written in January and irrelevant by May, and the link to pay was implied but never explained. Ask managers, and they say the paperwork consumed the time the conversation needed.

The systems are not usually badly designed on paper. They fail in execution, because they demand a level of managerial skill and candor that nobody built. Redesigning the form does not fix that. Building the manager's capability to set a clear expectation, give specific feedback close to the event, and defend a judgment consistently does, and it is slower and less satisfying to announce.

Course objectives

By the end of the course, participants will be able to:

  • Challenge engagement figures that performance does not support.
  • State the conditions a person needs before judging them.
  • Agree goals that survive the year and can still be judged.
  • Rate performance so the judgment survives comparison with a peer.
  • Adjust feedback so it arrives in days not months.
  • Coach a person to reach the judgment without being told.
  • Reward contribution in a way the recipient finds credible.
  • Confront a problem while it is still small and specific.
  • Document a judgment well enough to defend it later.

Course outline

Unit 1: Linking performance and engagement

  • What a rising engagement score hides about one person.
  • The clarity, resources and feedback one person is owed.
  • Manager variance as the largest single performance factor.
  • One person happier at work and no better at the job.

Unit 2: Setting goals and measuring performance

  • Setting SMART objectives one manager can actually judge.
  • Output, behavior and contribution in one person's review.
  • Ratings and calibration seen from the person being rated.
  • Goals overtaken by events, and the manager who resets them.

Unit 3: Feedback, coaching, and development

  • Specific, timely feedback and the sandwich that defeats it.
  • A judgment that is prepared, stated and then held.
  • Asking coaching questions instead of the manager's answer.
  • One person's development plan built from that conversation.

Unit 4: Recognition and motivation strategies

  • Pay that has stopped changing one person's behavior.
  • Recognition timed, specific and from the right manager.
  • Linking one person's pay and promotion to what they did.
  • Fairness felt by the person, not the size of the award.

Unit 5: Sustaining engagement and accountability

  • Building accountability without turning it into blame.
  • Managing one person's sustained underperformance fairly.
  • Measuring manager variance instead of survey averages.
  • Putting two ratings side by side for a manager to explain.

How the course is delivered

The course runs as facilitated discussion and structured case work. Participants analyze real performance systems, goal sets, rating distributions and engagement data, and rebuild the parts that do not work. Feedback and coaching techniques are examined through documented conversation transcripts and worked examples, discussed and critiqued in the room; there is no acted element. Participants are encouraged to bring their own performance forms and survey results, which usually produces the sharpest sessions.

Managers who want to develop the coaching side further will find it treated at length in Coaching and Mentoring for Employee Development.

Who should attend

  • Line managers who run performance conversations and want them to be worth having.
  • HR managers and business partners who own or are redesigning the performance cycle.
  • Reward, talent and organizational development specialists.
  • Senior leaders who suspect their performance system is producing compliance rather than performance.

About EuroQuest International Training

EuroQuest International Training was founded in 2015 by a team with more than 25 years of experience in professional development. We run over 1,000 courses and have trained more than 15,000 participants. Our head office is in Bratislava, Slovakia, and we deliver courses through hubs in Dubai, London, Barcelona, Istanbul, Vienna, Paris and Geneva. Courses are built and reviewed by practitioners who have worked in the fields they teach.

Frequently asked questions

Is this course for managers or for HR?

Both, and the mix is deliberate. HR designs the system, managers decide whether it means anything, and the two groups rarely hear each other's constraints as directly as they do in this course.

Does the course include a live lab?

No. There is no software environment or system access. Participants work from real performance documents, engagement data and conversation transcripts, which they analyze and rebuild.

Does it cover removing performance ratings?

Yes. Unit 2 covers the case for and against ratings and what the organizations that removed them actually experienced, which is more mixed than the early coverage suggested.

Related courses

Register for this course

Choose a city and date from the schedule above and register online, or contact the EuroQuest team for group bookings and in-house delivery. Where a management team attends together, the calibration and fairness discussions can be run against your own rating distribution.

All Course Dates & Locations

27 dates · 13 cities · Oct 2026 – Jun 2027

September - 2026
October - 2026
November - 2026
December - 2026
January - 2027
February - 2027
March - 2027
April - 2027
May - 2027
June - 2027
July - 2027
August - 2027
Amman
Amsterdam
Brussels
Cairo
Dubai
Geneva
Istanbul
Jakarta
London
Madrid
Manama
Singapore
Zurich
Showing 27 of 27 dates

Dubai

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Zurich

Fees: 6600
From:
To:

Istanbul

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Amsterdam

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Madrid

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Istanbul

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Dubai

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Jakarta

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Amsterdam

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Brussels

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Istanbul

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Dubai

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Amsterdam

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Istanbul

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Manama

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Istanbul

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Amman

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Singapore

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Madrid

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Zurich

Fees: 6600
From:
To:

Jakarta

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Geneva

Fees: 6600
From:
To:

Dubai

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

Cairo

Fees: 4700
From:
To:

London

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Brussels

Fees: 5900
From:
To:

Madrid

Fees: 5900
From:
To: